SAYS CENTRE CAN’T DIRECT BBMB TO GIVE WATER TO HIMACHAL PRADESH
SAYS BBMB ONLY LOOKS FOR MANAGEMENT OF DAMS AND NOT FOR ALLOCATION OF WATER
ASSERTS ORDERS OF GOI A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE ORDERS OF SC
SEEKS WITHDRAWAL OF DIRECTIONS WHICH ARE COMPLETELY UNJUSTIFIED, BASELESS AND GRAVE INJUSTICE WITH PUNJAB
Chandigarh, June 14-
Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann on Wednesday vehemently opposed the decision of the Government of India (GoI), to waive off the conditions of seeking No Objection Certificate (NOC) for drawing water by Himachal Pradesh for Water Supply and Irrigation schemes.
In a letter to the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Chief Minister said that it is unfortunate that the Union government had issued directions to the Chairman of Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB) in this regard on May 15, 2023. He said that vide these directions, GoI has directed the Chairman, BBMB to do away with the present mechanism of NOC with the condition that the cumulative drawal by the Government of Himachal Pradesh, is kept below their analogous share in power i.e. 7.19% as decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court. Bhagwant Mann said that further, BBMB shall only carry out technical feasibility study for drawal of water by Himachal Pradesh for water supply/irrigation projects, if it involves engineering structures of BBMB and convey the necessary technical requirements to Himachal Pradesh, within 60 days from receipt of such request.
The Chief Minister said that this decision is completely unjustified, baseless and grave injustice with Punjab because as per the water agreements, no water is required to be allocated to Himachal Pradesh out of the River Sutlej and Beas. He said that though the Hon’ble Supreme Court has allowed 7.19% share to Himachal Pradesh but that share only relates to power and no orders have been issued by the Apex Court regarding the sharing of water. Moreover, Bhagwant Mann said that the sharing of water is an Inter State dispute and no unilateral directions can be issued to share the waters by the states.
The Chief Minister further said that BBMB was constituted under Section 79(1) of the Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966, as per which the mandate of the board is only for administration, maintenance and operation of the dam and reservoirs viz. Nangal Hydel channel and Irrigation headworks at Ropar, Harike and Ferozepur. He categorically said that as per the Act, BBMB is not authorized to give any water out of the rivers to any state other than the partner States adding that Himachal Pradesh is not a partner State. Bhagwant Mann said that the waters of rivers Sutlej, Ravi and Beas have been allocated to Punjab, Haryana, J&K, Delhi and Rajasthan under separate agreements, and Himachal Pradesh cannot raise any claim on the waters of the said rivers.
The Chief Minister said that the water of these rivers has been earmarked for specific areas of the partner States, and the allocated water is supplied through a specific canal system. He further said that water is a State subject covered under Entry 17 of State list-II of the Constitution and the determination or adjudication of rights of river waters fall in the exclusive jurisdiction of a Tribunal to be constituted by the Central Government as per the provision of the Inter State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, enacted under Article 262 of the Constitution, based on a complaint raised by a State Government. Bhagwant Mann said that the partner States of Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan have been very liberal in the past to provide water out of the interstate carrier channels to the Himachal Pradesh for drinking purposes.
However, the Chief Minister bemoaned that GoI had by instant directions also included the irrigation schemes. He recalled that during the previous years, the BBMB has allowed release of water on 16 different occasions to Himachal Pradesh. Bhagwant Mann said that in the present circumstances when the water in the rivers is declining drastically year after year and there have been pressing demands for water by all the partner States namely, Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan, above said unilateral decision of the Government of India needs to be reconsidered and withdrawn.
